B-Viz
Kielderside Growth Agency logo

Kielderside Growth Agency

Prospect£0Negotiation · £155k/yr

AI facts

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026

Kielderside Growth Agency has no executed order form, no invoices and £0 contracted ARR. The 6 Oct 2026 notice names BG-Demo the intended winner of its Enterprise tender, subject to standstill. The 14 Jul 2026 final proposal states £125k a year and £155k in the first year including implementation. No platform usage is on record. The open new-business deal is at the CRM negotiation stage with expected close on 13 Nov 2026, and a check-in call is booked for 27 Oct 2026.

Read from 7 calls · 14 email threads · 1 news items · 1 deals · 7 people · 8 documents, newest 8 Oct 26

Profile

Updated 9 Oct 26
  • IndustryPublic sectorSource: CRM company record
  • Websitekielderside.exampleSource: CRM company record
  • CountryUnited KingdomSource: CRM company record · CRM code GB · Region UK
  • HQ cityNewcastle upon TyneSource: CRM company record
  • Size340 employeesSource: CRM company record
  • CRM ownerTom AshdownSource: CRM company record · Account Executive
  • TypeProspectdiffersSource: contracts and invoices (signals) · CRM stage opportunity · The sources disagree
  • StateProspectSource: AI assessment · As at Fri 9 Oct 2026 · written 21 Oct 2026

AI opinion

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026

Prospect, because nothing is signed: the award is intended, not confirmed, and the standstill and board approval still stand before signature. The security assessment passed with conditions and the 8 Oct 2026 call was positive. Opportunity: a company-wide Enterprise win across three teams at £125k a year.

AI · claude-opus-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

Key facts

Updated 9 Oct 26
  • Open dealNegotiation · £155,000Source: CRM deal Kielderside Growth Agency – New · new deal · Expected close 13 Nov 2026 · Owner Tom Ashdown
  • Last contact8 Oct 2026Call: Kielderside Growth Agency / BG-Demo – Negotiation · 1 days before 9 Oct 2026
Computedmade from

Next step

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026
What
Tom Ashdown submits through the portal a written commercial statement for Keith Robson that splits the £155k into implementation and annual subscription and sets out the freshness service credit wording. proposal
Who
Tom Ashdown Tom Ashdown
When
This week by 9 Oct 2026
Why
Tom Ashdown sends Keith Robson a written split of the £155k Enterprise bid into implementation and annual subscription, with freshness credit wording, through the portal, so the board can approve before signature planned for 13 Nov 2026.

AI · claude-opus-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

The story

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026
Prospect

Prospect: BG-Demo is intended winner of Kielderside's Enterprise tender at £125k a year, but nothing is signed. Standstill, board approval and a legal review of the funding clause stand before signature planned by 13 Nov 2026.

Prospect: Kielderside Growth Agency named BG-Demo intended winner of its Enterprise tender on 6 Oct 2026, but nothing is executed. The 14 Jul 2026 final proposal sets £125k a year, £155k in the first year with implementation.

No platform usage or connectors are on record; Emma Kirkup warned the grants system may be hard to connect. Keith Robson holds the budget, and Anil Bhatt passed security on 25 Aug 2026 with conditions.

Standstill and board approval come before signature planned by 13 Nov 2026. BG-Demo legal has not reviewed the funding termination clause, and owners for the monthly security reports are not yet named.

Tom Ashdown sends Keith a written split of the £155k with freshness credit wording through the portal, due 9 Oct 2026, while Owen Tallis arranges legal review. A check-in call is booked for 27 Oct 2026.

AI · claude-opus-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

ARR journey

No ARR history: no order forms or invoices for this organisation.

Accountingmade from

Finance read

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026

Prospect, one open deal

Standing No invoices

Kielderside Growth Agency is a prospect with no order form, no ARR and no invoices. One open new-business Enterprise deal is in negotiation at £155k, with annual value £125k and expected close on 13 Nov 2026.

  • No order form, so no ARR
  • Open Enterprise deal in negotiation, expected close 13 Nov 2026
  • Deal amount £155k is a forecast, not ARR
The analysis

Recurring revenue: none. No order form has started, so there is no ARR, and the CRM shows £0 at the opportunity stage.

Next commitment: nothing is contracted. The open deal is a forecast, not a win, with expected close on 13 Nov 2026.

Billing: there are no invoices, so nothing is owed or overdue.

Deals: one open new-business Enterprise deal at negotiation stage, amount £155k, annual value £125k. Its owner, Tom Ashdown, is active in HR.

Made from 1 deal · 2 fact tables

AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

History by quarter

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026

Each earlier quarter in one AI digest of its calls, email threads, tickets and news, newest first; from 1 Jul 2026 the assessment reads every one of them itself.

  1. Q2 2026

    Q2 2026: tender demos, price and budget open

    Two demos in a formal tender. Lesley Charlton was positive in April. In May procurement restated open tender rules, Tom gave an indicative £155k Enterprise total, and Keith Robson wanted whole-life cost. Keith had not replied to the invitation.

    The analysis

    Demo: On 7 Apr 2026 Hannah Lowe showed B-Viz on the agency's anonymised sample. Lesley said it was close to what account managers asked for, and Wendy Armstrong said she builds the outstanding-returns list by hand.

    Process: Lesley said she cannot discuss the tender outside the formal clarification process. Keith, who holds the budget, was not on the call, and BG-Demo owes a written note on access roles and data flow.

    Outreach: On 30 Apr 2026 Tom Ashdown invited Keith to the demo and promised to stay within the tender. The thread shows no reply, so Keith's interest is not shown.

    Second demo: On 5 May 2026 Hannah demoed to the Chief Executive, finance director and procurement lead. Sarah Dodds said the agency must buy by open tender with all questions through the portal.

    Price: Tom said BG-Demo's records hold £155k for an Enterprise deployment including implementation. Keith asked for the annual element separately and said he does not accept an unpriced option.

    Marketing: On 11 May 2026 Alice Brewer invited Sarah to a webinar on Thu 21 May 2026, stated to be unconnected to the tender. There is no response.

    Open at the end: the written access note, the written breakdown of the £155k figure, Keith's reply and whole-life cost, and the tender notice. Keith will not sign before any standstill period has ended. The 13 Nov 2026 close is internal planning only.

    Made from 2 calls · 2 email threads

    AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

  2. Q1 2026

    Q1 2026: tender discovery and demo planning

    One quarter of pre-sale activity with a public body buying by formal tender. Lesley Charlton acted as champion through discovery and demo planning. Budget sits with Keith, whose view is unknown. Nothing was agreed commercially.

    The analysis

    Marketing: On 18 Feb 2026 Alice Brewer, BG-Demo's Head of Marketing, invited Sarah Dodds in procurement to a London roundtable on 24 Feb 2026, stressing it was separate from the tender. There was no customer response.

    Scheduling: On 17 Mar 2026 Tom Ashdown asked Lesley Charlton for a discovery call. She agreed, wanted a grants colleague and an enquiries colleague present, and asked for topics first.

    Discovery: On the 23 Mar 2026 call, Lesley and Emma Kirkup described three unmatched records of each business and board reporting that takes a couple of weeks each quarter. Tom said Enterprise would be proposed, with the security review and SSO.

    Demo: On 30 Mar 2026 Tom proposed a demo following one business through three views. Lesley agreed, chose example records for now and will send dates.

    People: Lesley is the champion. Emma is worried about who sees grant assessments and is a single point of knowledge. Keith holds the budget and was not on the call.

    Open at the end: No budget, proposal or tender outcome is recorded. Demo dates and attendees, including whether Keith attends, were still to come. Tom's pencilled 13 Nov 2026 is BG-Demo's own planning date, not the customer's.

    Made from 1 call · 3 email threads

    AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

  3. Q2 2025

    Q2 2025: public tender under way

    One read in the quarter: a 13 May 2025 news item says Kielderside Growth Agency is running a public tender for Enterprise-tier technology. No decision had been announced.

    The analysis

    News: this period holds one read, a North East Business Ledger item dated 13 May 2025. It reports that the agency is evaluating Enterprise-tier technology through a public tender.

    Aim: the agency wants account managers, the enquiries line and the grants team to see each business in one view. As a publicly owned body it is following procurement rules and will report the outcome.

    Assessment: the read rates this as a possible new engagement, a company-wide Enterprise engagement across three teams. It also notes that procurement rules mean the award may go to another bidder.

    Open at the end: the outcome of the tender, who owns the response and the current status of the process. The read's suggested next step is to establish the status of the tender and who owns the response. The evidence does not show whether BG-Demo bid.

    Made from 1 news item

    AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

  4. Q1 2025

    Q1 2025: webinar invite during open tender

    One read in the period: an email thread on 1 Jan 2025 in which Sofia Marchetti invited Keith Robson to an online webinar on 16 Jan 2025, saying it was unconnected to the tender. The thread holds no customer response.

    The analysis

    Period: this is a single read, the 1 Jan 2025 email thread. Nothing else from the organisation is recorded in the quarter.

    Invitation: Sofia Marchetti invited Keith Robson to an online BG-Demo webinar on 16 Jan 2025. She said it was not connected to the tender and raised no price or terms.

    Content: the session was aimed at finance and operations leaders and covered reporting, audit and the cost of reconciling separate systems. Sofia said commercial matters go through procurement in writing, and that Keith could decline while the tender runs.

    Customer view: the thread holds no customer response, so sentiment is neutral by default and not a stated position.

    Open at the end: the next step was for Keith to reply if he wanted joining details, otherwise Sofia would share a recording. The read flags that outreach to a finance director during an open tender must stay separate from the evaluation. The evidence does not show whether he joined or replied.

    Made from 1 email thread

    AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

  5. Q4 2024

    Q4 2024: roundtable invite during open tender

    One read in the period: on 19 Nov 2024 Sofia Marchetti invited Anil Bhatt to a London roundtable on 26 Nov 2024, saying it was separate from the open tender. The thread holds no customer response.

    The analysis

    This period holds one read, an email thread dated 19 Nov 2024.

    Invitation: Sofia Marchetti invited Anil Bhatt to an in-person roundtable in London on 26 Nov 2024. She described a small, informal session on keeping systems joined up and on access and governance.

    Tender: she stated the roundtable is separate from the tender. Tender conversations must go through Sarah Dodds and the portal, and she said Anil need not attend while the process is open.

    Customer view: the thread shows no response from the customer, and the read rates the sentiment as neutral. The read notes that governance and access topics touch the security needs of an Enterprise-style buyer.

    Risk: contact during an open tender could be seen as improper, so it must stay clearly separate from the evaluation.

    Open at the end: the evidence does not show whether Anil replied, held a place or sent a colleague. It also does not show how the tender ended.

    Made from 1 email thread

    AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

  6. Q3 2024

    Q3 2024: one webinar invitation, no reply

    One read: on 9 Sep 2024 Nell Ashcombe invited chief executive Paul Hetherington to a BG-Demo webinar on 19 Sep 2024. It was an open invitation with no meeting requested, and the thread holds no customer response.

    The analysis

    Webinar invitation: the period holds one read, an email thread dated 9 Sep 2024. Nell Ashcombe invited Paul Hetherington, addressed as chief executive, to the BG-Demo webinar on 19 Sep 2024.

    Pitch: Nell described a single layer inside the organisation's own Snowflake account. She said colleagues in account management, the enquiries line or grants could attend.

    Customer view: the thread holds no customer response. The read rates the sentiment as neutral and the voice as decision-maker.

    Open at the end: the next step was that Paul would reply if he wished to join, otherwise Nell would send a recording. The evidence does not show whether he replied, attended or received a recording. The read sees a possible wider conversation about B-Viz later, with a chief executive audience.

    Made from 1 email thread

    AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

  7. Q4 2023

    Q4 2023: one webinar invitation, no reply

    One read in the quarter: on 28 Oct 2023 Nell Ashcombe invited Lesley Charlton to a BG-Demo webinar on 16 Nov 2023, not a sales call. The thread shows no customer response.

    The analysis

    Webinar invitation: the quarter holds one read, an email thread dated 28 Oct 2023. Nell Ashcombe invited Lesley Charlton to a BG-Demo webinar on 16 Nov 2023 and said it was explicitly not a sales call.

    Offer: Nell described how B-Viz joins CRM, calls, emails and tickets in the organisation's own Snowflake account. She suggested bringing account management or grants colleagues.

    Customer view: there is no customer response in the thread, so interest is not shown. The evidence does not show whether Lesley attended or asked for joining details.

    Open at the end: Lesley was to reply if she wanted joining details, otherwise Nell would send a recording. The evidence does not show which happened.

    Made from 1 email thread

    AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

Platform usage

No platform usage: this organisation has no tenant in product analytics.

Documents

Updated 9 Oct 26

8 documents in 3 folders; 2 drafts hang on their executed paper. All documents

  • other
  • presales

Size is importance: state 40%, category 20%, recency 25% (18-month half-life on the as-of date) and usage 15%. There are no view counts: usage means how many of our own analyses cite the document, saturating at 5. A draft hangs on the executed or issued document it drafts for, in the same folder. A draft with nothing executed behind it stays a small leaf on its own.

Folders and documents as a list
Documentsmade from

Open deals

DealStageAmountClose
Kielderside Growth Agency – Newnegotiation£155,00013 Nov 2026

Open tickets

No open tickets.

Helpdeskmade from

Activity

Contacts

Evidence trail

Updated 9 Oct 26
Key
  • Source rows
  • Raw things
  • People
  • Organisation
  • Organisation AI
  • Pages
  • AI-written record (ring)
  • AI record not written yet
  • belongs to the organisation (one line per group)
  • Size: how many records a group holds
  • Columns, left to right: Source rows, Raw things, AI summaries, People, Organisation, Organisation AI, Narratives, Pages

Kielderside Growth Agency's pages are written from 3 organisation-level AI texts (assessment / next steps), 7 period digests and 1 narrative-level AI text, which in turn draw on 30 AI summaries of 31 raw things (calls, tickets, emails, news), 1 usage read, 1 finance read, 7 people (7 with an AI write-up) and 6 staff (0 with an AI write-up), shown on 4 pages. 2 AI records in this trail are not written yet.

The trail as a list (block, record, entity, raw row)
Computedmade from
Sources AI · Calls · CRM · Documents · Events · Email · Web

BG-Demo is a fictional company; every organisation and person here is invented. B-Viz is the tool. Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Help & Support

Help & Support

Open as a page

Help & Support

B-Viz is one place to read everything the company knows about its customers: the CRM, calls, emails, support tickets, product usage, invoices, documents, news and HR. Every page is built from those systems and the data is current to Fri 9 Oct 2026.

How to use the site

How to ask

Press Ask B (the speech bubble) in the header, or open the Ask B page. Type a question, or pick one of the suggestions.

What the data covers

DataRecords
Organisations300
People at customers1,880
BG-Demo staff records (in post and leavers)65
Calls2,593
Email threads3,882
Support tickets1,502
Documents1,582
Deals403
Invoices365
Events49
News items147

Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Text marked AI was written by the AI from the records listed in its made-from link; an AI output that cannot cite its evidence is refused and the previous text kept. Where two systems disagree (for example a contract and the CRM), the key facts show both values and mark the difference.

BG-Demo is a fictional company: every organisation, person and figure here is invented for this demonstration. B-Viz is the tool that reads its data.

Who to contact

Email info@b-viz.com or talk to your B-Viz account team. Tell us the page address and what looked wrong; a screenshot helps.

Help

Ask B

B-Viz · read-only