What happened
What this says
As at Fri 9 Oct 2026The partnership table showed extra records that did not match the CRM before partner reviews. Kate Ormerod ran a clean reindex, and the ticket was closed on 19 Jul 2026.
Problem: Bethany Cole, Head of University Partnerships, reported that the partnership table showed duplicate and old records, which were throwing off counts for the coming partner reviews.
Handling: Kate Ormerod found that a duplicate had slipped through the last refresh, ran a clean reindex the same day and asked Bethany to check the count. The header records 458 minutes to first response, but the first reply in the thread is timed at 15:00 that day.
The ticket was solved on 15 Jul 2026 and closed on 19 Jul 2026. The record does not show Bethany confirming the count.
Details
Updated 9 Oct 26Trail
- created · Bethany Cole 24 Jun 2026 08:53I've noticed the partnership table in the brain is showing duplicates. When I check it against our CRM, there are extra records that shouldn't be there. Can you see what's happening? We've got partner reviews coming up and I need the data clean.
- Public reply · Bethany Cole 24 Jun 2026 11:28Actually, I've dug into this more and the brain is showing significantly more records than we have in the CRM. Some look like duplicates, some appear to be old versions. It's throwing off our counts for the reviews.
- Public reply · Kate Ormerod 24 Jun 2026 15:00Hi Bethany, thanks for flagging this. I've looked at your partnership table and found the issue. A duplicate slipped through in the last refresh and pulled in some old records. I'm going to run a clean reindex to clear this up.
- Public reply · Kate Ormerod 24 Jun 2026 16:31All done, your partnership table is now synced correctly with your CRM. The next nightly refresh will keep it in sync. Can you verify the count now matches what you expect?
- Status change · 19 Jul 2026 23:59