Kalmthout Distributie

All three Kalmthout Distributie documents were read: a security questionnaire and two Growth tier proposals at £44k a year. None is an executed order form, so contracted price, dates and service levels are not established.

Executed: no document has the stored status executed. Contracted price, term, billing and service levels are therefore not established, and every executed term below is null.

Open items: the Growth tier proposal issued by Matteo Ricci on 15 Dec 2025 has the document status final. Its text is still an unsigned proposal at £44k a year with a deal amount of £56k total contract value, and it says an order form will follow.

Open items: the internal first-version proposal of 10 Dec 2025 is a draft marked not for sending. It carries the same £44k a year and £56k figures, and the 15 Dec 2025 proposal supersedes it.

Open items: the security questionnaire completed by Anya Petrova on 5 Dec 2025 has the document status final. It describes hosting inside the customer's own Snowflake account and refresh each business day, and it defers availability and response times to the order form.

Contradictions: the three documents do not disagree with one another on price, scope or service levels. Both proposals quote £44k a year, which matches the v1 Growth list rather than the v2 list in force for new business from 1 Dec 2025, and neither states a discount.

Commitments: no live obligations can be drawn, because no document is executed. The questionnaire's hosting and refresh answers describe the standard Growth set-up, not contracted terms.

Gaps: no order form, no signatory, no start or renewal date, no connector list and no billing terms appear in any document. The records do not show whether an order form was ever signed. Finance should check accounting before treating the £56k deal amount as contracted, because it may include the one-off implementation fee and is not an annual figure.

AI · claude-opus-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026