Ulleskelf Garden Centres

Ulleskelf Garden Centres has three documents and none is executed: a security questionnaire, a draft proposal and a final proposal, both proposals quoting Growth at £44k a year. No contracted price or terms are on file.

Executed: none of the three documents is executed, so there is no contracted price, term, billing or service level on file. The roll-up covers all three documents held, and all three were read.

Open items:

• The final proposal of 29 Dec 2025 from Sophie Ling recommends Growth at £44k a year, with a total deal value of £56k that includes the implementation fee. It is unsigned.
• The draft proposal of 22 Dec 2025 carries the same figures and is superseded in practice by the final version.
• The security questionnaire of 17 Dec 2025 from Hannah Lowe is stored as final but leaves access control and encryption to be confirmed by the security team.

Contradictions: no figures conflict between the documents. The draft and final proposals quote the same price, total deal value and one business hour P1 first response.

Price note: £44k matches the v1 Growth list, not the v2 list of £50k that applied to new business before the final proposal was dated. Neither proposal says whether the gap is an intended first-term discount.

Commitments: there are no live commitments, because no document is executed. The questionnaire describes nightly refresh by 07:00 and a one business hour P1 response, and it points availability to the order form, which is not on file.

Gaps: the documents do not show an order form, a signatory, a start date, payment terms or connector delivery dates. They also do not show whether Hannah sent the promised written security confirmation.

Next move: confirm with Sophie Ling whether an order form followed the 29 Dec 2025 proposal. Also confirm the price basis before anyone treats £44k as contracted.

AI · claude-opus-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026